Arabic AR Chinese (Simplified) ZH-CN English EN French FR German DE Japanese JA Portuguese PT Russian RU Spanish ES Ukrainian UK

Department of Justice Mocks California’s Request to Move ‘Sanctuary State’ Lawsuit to San Francisco

Latest news

    The Department of Justice has filed a motion opposing the State of California’s effort to move a lawsuit against its “sanctuary state” laws from a federal district court in Sacramento to one in San Francisco.

    As Politico’s Josh Gerstein reported Monday (original links):

    In a submission to Sacramento-based U.S. District Court Judge John Mendez on Monday, Justice Department lawyers seemed to ridicule the transfer proposal floated last week by attorneys from the office of state Attorney General Xavier Becerra.

    “It is remarkable that the State of California would seek to delay this matter primarily so that it can avoid litigating in its State capital. There is no basis to seriously entertain this request that the case be transferred,” Justice Department lawyers wrote. “California’s wish to defend these challenges in another federal judicial district in San Francisco, where the State capital is not located and where the official Defendants do not reside, makes no sense.”

    Lawyers from Justice’s Office of Immigration Litigation called the state’s transfer suggestion “meritless,” despite the fact that attorneys for the state have yet to file a formal motion seeking the transfer. In a scheduling filing last Friday, lawyers from Becerra’s office said a transfer to San Francisco would be warranted because a judge there is already considering a case that involves a federal law seeking to prohibit certain local and state policies from preventing cooperation with immigration authorities.

    The San Francisco court is notoriously left-wing and has ruled against the Trump administration on immigration issues in the past. In addition, the presiding judge in the state’s ongoing case in San Francisco against President Trump’s executive order stripping grants from sanctuary cities, William Orrick III, is a Barack Obama appointee — and past donor.

    In contrast, the judge in Sacramento, John Mendez, is a George W. Bush appointee.

    The State of California argues that the issues in the San Francisco and Sacramento cases are the same; the Department of Justice disagrees.

    View the original article:

    Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He was named to Forward’s 50 “most influential” Jews in 2017. He is the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

    In the same category are

    Delingpole: Welcome to Britain 2018, Where Jokes Are Now Illegal Welcome to Britain 2018, where jokes are now illegal. I’m referring, of course, to the case of the blogger Markus Meechan – Count Dankula – who has no...
    Vatican Cracks Down on Critics of Pope Francis The Vatican has taken new measures to punish critics of Pope Francis in a move that seems to belie the pope’s earlier calls for greater dialogue and d...
    2020: CNN Declares Joe Biden Dem. Frontrunner CNN on Thursday declared former Vice President Joe Biden is the early 2020 frontrunner for the Democrats. Biden’s polling average in all national 2020...
    Blue State Blues: Republicans Are at Bat, but Democrats Score the Runs It happened again. Congress let a funding debate come down to the last minute. And once again, Democrats won. The new omnibus spending bill is a wretc...
    Border Wall: GOP Makes Excuses, Pelosi Taunts Trump The GOP establishment is offering excuses for its refusal to fund the border wall, while Democrats are taunting President Donald Trump over their succ...
    Donald Trump: ‘I Am Considering a Veto of the Omnibus Spending Bill’ President Donald Trump announced on Twitter on Friday that he was considering a veto of the omnibus spending bill. “I am considering a VETO of the Omn...

    Leave a comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *