Arabic AR Chinese (Simplified) ZH-CN English EN French FR German DE Japanese JA Portuguese PT Russian RU Spanish ES Ukrainian UK


How big is the university pensions black hole?

Latest news

    University picketImage copyright UCU

    At the heart of the pensions dispute between university staff and their employers is a disagreement over how much the pension pot is in deficit.

    The universities want to change the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) from a defined-benefit scheme, which gives a guaranteed retirement income, to a defined-contribution scheme, where their pensions would be subject to changes in the stock market.

    Most final salary pension schemes like this one have already closed.

    The managers of the scheme argue this is necessary because the fund is £6.1bn in deficit – in other words, that’s the size of the gap between how much it has and how much it thinks it will owe to members in the future.

    But the University and Colleges Union (UCU) has been disputing these figures, saying it could be as much as £8.3bn in surplus.

    The numbers are important because this multi-billion pound “black hole” in the fund has been used by universities as the reason it is not financially sustainable and must close.

    So who’s right?

    The problem is, any figure given on how much a pension is in deficit is by nature an estimate.

    Not an exact science

    Imagine you promise a roomful of people that you will give them as much cake as they want at some point in the future – but you don’t know how much cake you’re going to have or how hungry they will be. That gives you a vague idea of the challenges facing pension schemes.

    Valuing how much a pension fund has and how much it owes is not an exact science.

    The amount owed depends on factors such as how long its members live and therefore how many years they draw a pension for. Life expectancy could rise or stagnate.

    And the amount of money it has depends on what happens with its investments.

    So there is a lot of guesswork involved in all of the numbers you hear.

    ‘Overly prudent’

    To calculate how much the fund is in deficit, the USS trustees look at how much they estimate they will owe to all the current members of their scheme in the future. That’s their liabilities.

    They then discount this figure by how much return they expect to make on their investments (the “discount rate”).

    From this, they subtract the amount of money they currently have in assets (£60bn). That gives us the £6.1bn figure.

    So that’s the gap between what they have and what they owe – the gap they need to try to close.

    Having a deficit is not an immediate problem, because not all the pensions in the scheme have to be paid out at the same time.

    But the scheme’s managers do have to show the Pensions Regulator they have a plan to deal with it.

    The UCU describes this calculation as “overly prudent”.

    Its suggestion the fund is actually in surplus uses a best-case scenario.

    However, pension funds are not legally allowed to run a deficit assuming a best-case scenario.

    Schemes such as this one are essentially promises to pay someone money made over a very long period of time.

    Young academic staff already in the scheme are being promised they will be paid a final-salary pension in 40 or 50 years’ time.


    In that period of time, it’s possible that the stock market could grow and the investments could do well and the money in the pot would be enough to cover staff pensions.

    But in the case that investments don’t perform well, the amount of money you have to have in the pot to ensure enough money in the future goes up.

    Former Pensions Minister Baroness Ros Altmann says this uncertainty is one of the biggest issues facing any pension scheme.

    To see how difficult it is to establish what’s happening with a pension fund, she points at the latest government figures on overall pension liabilities, which uses a discount rate of 5% – the measure of the estimated amount of money investments will make.

    If they had used a rate of 4%, she says, their liabilities (the gap between what they have and what they owe) would have been a quarter more.

    All of this is how you get such drastically different figures thrown around, none of which is wrong.

    It just depends what level of risk the universities are willing to take – and that’s what the union says needs to be looked at again.

    Read more from Reality Check

    Send us your questions

    Follow us on Twitter

    View the original article:

    In the same category are

    Sport Relief raises more than £38m for charities The BBC's Sport Relief event had raised £38,195,278m for charitable causes by the end of its live TV show. The programme included celebrity boxing m...
    Hyperemesis gravidarum: The mum whose morning sickness has never gone away Image copyright Caitlin Dean Image caption Caitlin Dean with daughter Orla: "Even though my second pregnancy was my worst, I knew I wanted three ki...
    The woman who brought skull watches back to life Media playback is unsupported on your device Media captionDeath watches draw inspiration from historyWhen design student Fiona Krüger first knocked ...
    Meghan Markle: The wellness guru she could have been Image copyright Getty Images There's a common misconception that most little girls dream about one day becoming a princess, with a prince who can sw...
    Tuberculosis rates in England fall by third in six years Image copyright Science Photo Library New figures show rates of tuberculosis (TB) in England have declined by a third in six years, and are currentl...
    Behind the job: Life as a Formula 1 mechanic Image copyright Williams F1 If go-kart racers dream of sitting behind the wheel of an F1 car, then you can bet there are plenty of local garage mech...

    Leave a comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *