Arabic AR Chinese (Simplified) ZH-CN English EN French FR German DE Japanese JA Portuguese PT Russian RU Spanish ES Ukrainian UK

Trump ends Obamacare subsidies that ‘cannot lawfully’ be paid

Latest news

    View the original article:

    Cost-sharing reduction payments to insurance companies under the Affordable Care Act will no longer continue, the Trump administration has announced. The White House cited federal court decisions finding no appropriation was ever lawfully enacted.

    “Based on guidance from the Department of Justice,” a White House statement released Thursday night said, “the Department of Health and Human Services has concluded that there is no appropriation for cost-sharing reduction payments to insurance companies under Obamacare.”

    Read more

    'Tremendous competition': Trump signs executive order relaxing healthcare rules

    “The United States House of Representatives sued the previous administration in Federal court for making these payments without such an appropriation, and the court agreed that the payments were not lawful,” the statement said.

    The White House statement, issued by Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, ended on a political note.

    “The bailout of insurance companies through these unlawful payments is yet another example of how the previous administration abused taxpayer dollars and skirted the law to prop up a broken system,” it read. “Congress needs to repeal and replace the disastrous Obamacare law and provide real relief to the American people.”

    Earlier the same day, President Donald Trump signed an executive order allowing small businesses to group together and purchase healthcare plans for their employees across state lines.

    Insurance premiums under Obamacare have “skyrocketed,” Trump said before signing the order. He cited premiums in Alaska going up 200 percent and noted that one-third of all US counties have only one insurer on the Obamacare exchange, while some counties may soon have none at all.

    While the changes from the executive order may not take effect for at least several months, due to the rule-making process, this late Thursday decision may be felt sooner, unless a new court finding recognizes legally instituted appropriations for the cost-sharing reduction payouts.

    In the same category are

    When FARA is not far enough: US lawmakers invent new ways to brand RT as propaganda US lawmakers are suggesting new ways to brand RT and Sputnik as “propaganda,” believing registration as ‘foreign agents’ is not enough. RT is already ...
    EU approves Bayer’s $62.5bn takeover of GMO & pesticide giant Monsanto Germany's Bayer won EU antitrust approval on Wednesday for its multi-billion-dollar purchase of Monsanto. The mega-merger is expected to reshape the a...
    ‘Next Deepwater Horizon disaster a matter of time’: Critics slam record offshore oil lease sale The Trump administration has held the biggest lease sale of oil and gas in US history. Environmentalists fear the auction will massively expand fossil...
    GOP Rep wants border wall between California and Arizona to ‘keep out criminals’ It’s not just the US-Mexico border which could witness a forbidding wall cropping up soon. A GOP representative wants to build a similar barrier betwe...
    ‘US military a bunch of dumb s**ts’ – teacher fired for rant A California teacher filmed describing US military personnel as “dumb s**ts” in an astonishing rant has been fired. The decision to sack Gregory Salci...

    Leave a comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *