Why some experts think the House might have a problem with its health care bill


It’s about to get wonky.

There is speculation in Washington that House leadership might have to work some magic on its health care bill — again.

Visit our new websites featuring all the news and latest technology that is about to change the world we live in forever

New reports indicate the bill as passed might run afoul of the complex Senate rules Republicans are using to pass the legislation without any Democratic votes. And if that were to happen, it would probably be because House Republicans rushed their bill through, adding provisions at the very last minute, and passed it without an official analysis of what it would do and cost. They faced heavy criticism for that at the time, and these new developments suggest it might be a major problem for the bill.

Bloomberg reported on Thursday evening that the House had not actually sent their legislation to the Senate yet, even though it passed a couple weeks ago — and that was because they were waiting for the official analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

All the links in Encyclopedic.co.uk stories are in RED with a Square and arrow, follow the links if you need to get more information, All our stories have all the links back to the original source, we also have other versions of the story on our website, Search our site using the link to the top left, check them all so you can decide what is the truth or copy and paste some words into google and get even more sources.

Any external stories, features, news feeds, articles or external website content, linked to from within this website (through direct links or RSS feed boxes, etc.) are the absolute, and strict, copyright of the writers, owners or publishers concerned.

Search our Site 


Depending on what the CBO says, the House might have to change the American Health Care Act and pass it again or even start over, according to Bloomberg.

Experts have wondered if the House bill would work under the Senate’s rules, which are supposed to restrict a bill considered under “budget reconciliation” to make sure it affects only federal spending and revenue. If those strict conditions are met, then the Senate can advance a bill with just 50 votes. Republicans are using that process because otherwise Democrats could block the legislation.

Provisions in the bill that affect insurance regulations, for example, have been suspect for a while, according to budget and procedure experts. Those wouldn’t seem to affect government spending directly.

But new issues are cropping up on Thursday night, sowing doubts about the Republicans’ bid to repeal and replace Obamacare. We won’t know for sure until CBO releases its updated report, which is expected next week, and it may prove to be much ado about nothing. But it’s worth breaking down the issues, given the stakes.

If the House bill did pass, CBO previously projected that 24 million more Americans would be uninsured and Medicaid spending would be cut by $840 billion over the next decade. If these predictions of procedural problems prove true, the Republican pledge to repeal Obamacare could be in jeopardy.

One issue is pretty simple; the other is more complex. Here goes.

A last-minute tweak to the AHCA could lead to more people buying insurance and too much federal spending

This one is pretty straightforward: The GOP’s health care bill must save at least $2 billion under these complex Senate rules, which Vox’s Sarah Kliff outlined. It is at least plausible that one last-minute tweak to the bill would violate that requirement.

House Republicans added a provision in their bill that allows states to waive certain Obamacare regulations, such as the prohibition on health plans charging sick people more than healthy people and the requirement that they cover certain services, with some conditions.

Those waivers could lead to skimpier plans and/or lower premiums — which could, in turn, actually lead to more people buying insurance and using the tax credits from the federal government that the Republican bill creates to do so.

It depends on a lot of different factors: How many states would actually want one of these waivers, and how many people would be expected to buy coverage?

But it’s at least possible this provision could cost too much. The most recent CBO analysis of the House bill, released before the waivers were added, projected that the legislation would save $150 billion.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a group of budget experts who are pretty smart about these things, estimated that if 10 million more Americans were projected to buy insurance now, after the waivers were added, the bill would suddenly cost $115 billion.

So the revised bill would break the Senate rules, because it costs money instead of saving it. That’s potential problem No. 1, though it depends on some unpredictable variables, like how many states would take a waiver, that CBO could struggle to project.

Last-minute funding added to the House bill could also be a problem

This is going to get wonky. The bill needs to save $2 billion under the Senate rules, but it’s really more complicated than that: Two different Senate committees actually need to save $1 billion each through changes to policies that fall under their jurisdictions. The Senate Finance Committee needs to save $1 billion, and the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee needs to save $1 billion.

Most of the bill’s major provisions — the tax credits and the Medicaid overhaul — fall under the Finance Committee’s jurisdiction. But the health committee is going to claim a few policies as its own.

According to CRFB, those could include the repeal of Obamacare’s public health and prevention fund, the repeal of the law’s cost-sharing reductions, and the creation of a “stabilization fund” for states to reform their insurance markets.

The House ended up pumping more money into the stabilization fund at the last minute to win over moderate members who were worried about too many people losing their insurance — so much money that, by some expert estimates, the bill might not achieve the $1 billion for the health committee that it needs to.

Here’s the math that CRFB’s Ed Lorenzen, the group’s resident budget expert, laid out to me on Thursday evening, which could suggest the House bill is in trouble:

  • Repealing the Prevention Fund saves $9 billion.
  • Repealing the cost-saving reductions saves $103 billion.
  • Creating the stabilization fund originally cost $80 billion.
  • Adding the last-minute money to the bill costs up to $38 billion.

So if you add up the savings and the costs, the provisions under the health committee’s jurisdiction could cost $6 billion, by these estimates. That would again put the bill in violation of the Senate rules, which require $1 billion in savings.

It depends on a few things, as Lorenzen freely acknowledged. Republicans might quibble with whether those provisions really belong under the health committee’s jurisdiction, or CBO might decide the new money won’t be fully spent.

Presented with those numbers, House aides nonetheless projected confidence that their bill would pass muster, because of how the different policies in the bill interact with each other.

And that may very well end up being true.

But it’s a new wrinkle in the GOP’s roller-coaster ride to repeal Obamacare. Fixing those problems — by, for example, reducing spending for the stabilization fund — presents political, practical, and possibly still procedural problems.

View the original article: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/18/15661290/house-health-care-bill-ahca-cbo-problems

It all combines to make next week’s CBO report a little more dramatic.

Beware of other sites you have never heard of giving you news, a lot of them are just wanting to feed you multiple popup adverts and malware

Visit us on facebook at https://www.facebook.com/notinthemainstreamnews/
We use all our content under fair use to compare who is Fake and who is not, we do not claim ownership at all, all stories are published by the owners as FREE RSS Feeds.

Othen.bizRegisteredgites.com Giteinfrance.biz – Simonothen.com = Northernsoulers.uk – LaBataille.co.uk

In the same category are

It’s time to revisit Children of Men, whose near-future British dystopia feels achingly close One of the best of its genre, the movie has lessons for us in tumultuous times. Every weekend, we pick a movie you can stream that dovetails with cur...
A critical mass of Republicans are rejecting the Senate health care bill “You’re either gonna get 50 or probably 35.” Senate Republican leaders want to vote on their bill to repeal and replace Obamacare in three days, but ...
Privately, health plan worries Senate bill would “cause most small employers’ premiums to go up” A large health plan is privately expressing concern that a little-noticed provision in the Senate health bill could drive up premiums for small busin...
Netflix’s GLOW casts the Gorgeous Ladies of Wrestling in a scattered but undeniably fun comedy GLOW is like A League of Their Own, but with snarling ’80s wrestlers. What’s not to like? There may be no more immediately appealing premise on TV th...
Vox Sentences: Jobs, jobs, jobs (are still moving to Mexico) Vox Sentences is your daily digest for what's happening in the world, curated by Ella Nilsen. Sign up for the Vox Sentences newsletter, delivered str...
Vox Sentences: FOUND: 1 Senate health care bill, 700 grizzly bears Vox Sentences is your daily digest for what's happening in the world, curated by Ella Nilsen . Sign up for the Vox Sentences newsletter, delivered st...
The outrage over Gal Gadot’s $300,000 paycheck for Wonder Woman, explained It was sparked by an absurd, inaccurate claim that Henry Cavill made $14 million when he appeared in Man of Steel. Thanks to a poorly sourced news st...
63 percent of Republicans in deep-red districts don’t like the AHCA As GOP Senators draft their version of the American Health Care Act, it’s becoming clear that the majority of the country is opposed to what the Repu...
Meditation is thriving under Trump. A former monk explains why. The Headspace app co-founder on monetizing mindfulness. Like any startup founder well-trained in public relations, Andy Puddicombe is reluctant to ta...
Twin Peaks episode 7: The series brings new meaning to the idea of an “18-hour movie” Things are starting to pick up as we enter what looks like the second act. In the lead-up to this season of Twin Peaks, co-creator David Lynch, who c...
Why Megyn Kelly may help spread Alex Jones’s lies even if she calls them bullshit Science suggests simply repeating lies helps them stick. Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones will appear Sunday night on Megyn Kelly’s primetime televisio...
Protesters disrupted Shakespeare in the Park in outrage over its Trump-like Julius Caesar The pair seems to have misread the 400-year-old play. Two protesters interrupted the Public Theater’s Shakespeare in the Park performance of Julius C...
Solar eclipse 2017: The best places to see the rare phenomenon this August NASA produced these extremely accurate maps of the 2017 solar eclipse. On August 21, for the first time in 99 years, a total solar eclipse will cut t...
Vox Sentences: “It would have been a massacre” Vox Sentences is your daily digest for what's happening in the world, written by Ella Nilsen. Sign up for the Vox Sentences newsletter, delivered str...
“No one cares”: House Republicans look the other way after Sessions testimony With every development in the congressional probes into Russia’s alleged ties to President Donald Trump’s team, Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL) goes through t...
Shakespeare in the Park featured a Trump-like Julius Caesar, and right-wing media freaked out The outrage forced corporate sponsors to pull out — but it missed the point of the play. For decades, conservatives have darkly warned that failing t...
Twin Peaks episode 6: Watching this season is like endlessly changing channels on your TV But in a good way! Ever since that shot of Sarah Palmer watching a wildlife documentary in the Twin Peaks premiere, I’ve been toying with the idea th...
How the Babadook became the LGBTQ icon we didn’t know we needed How terrorizing a white Australian family became an act of queer defiance. There are two types of people in this world: People who know that the Baba...
Marvel’s Black Panther: Watch the first trailer It’s hard for a good man to be king… The very first teaser trailer for Marvel’s Black Panther has arrived, featuring our newest look at Chadwick Bose...
Vox Sentences: Mr. Comey goes to Washington Vox Sentences is your daily digest for what's happening in the world, curated by Dylan Matthews and Dara Lind. Sign up for the Vox Sentences newslett...

Special Promotion

Fancy a holiday in rural France ?

Find your ideal holiday accommodation in France, with peace of mind that all our properties are officially registered

Our aim is to provide potential holiday makers with a choice of properties, all of which are officially recognised by the French authorities as holiday lettings.  Every gite and holiday accommodation on our website is registered in France in one of two ways. It is either registered with the local Mayor as a tourism/short stay property or is is registered as a holiday letting business in France and so has a SIRET number. We will not advertise any properties unless we have seen evidence of this. If you want anymore information about this, please do contact us.

Follow us on Twitter 

Dont forget to “Like” us on Facebook

Other Video sections include:  Disclose TV – Twit Podcasts – Coming Soon our own Youtube Channel

We also recommend the excellent “No Agenda Podcast”  with Adam Curry & John C Dvorak

Comment on this story