Justice Department IG Report Says Peter Strzok Had ‘Biased State of Mind’

Latest news

    The long-awaited Justice Department inspector general report on the DOJ and FBI’s handling of the Clinton email investigation released Thursday found that FBI agent Peter Strzok had a “biased state of mind” that may have played a role in his conduct during the investigation.

    Specifically, the inspector general found a text from FBI official Peter Strzok that did evidence bias, and might have been behind the FBI’s lack of action in investigating Clinton emails found on Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin’s husband Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

    The report said the August 8, 2016 text message exchange between Strzok and his lover FBI lawyer Lisa Page that showed that Strzok had a “biased state of mind” and implied a “willingness to take action.”

    Page had texted Strzok: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president right? Right?!”

    Strzok texted back, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”

    Investigators believe Strzok’s bias may have led to his inaction in September 2016 when Clinton emails were found on Weiner’s laptop and it took weeks before the FBI acted on it.

    The report stated:

    “Text messages of FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok indicated that he, McCabe, and Priestap discussed the Weiner laptop on September 28. Strzok said that he initially planned to send a team to New York to review the emails, but a conference all with [New York Office] was scheduled instead.

    “Additional discussions took place on October 3 and 4, 2016. However, after October 4, we found no evidence that anyone associated with the Midyear investigation, including the entire leadership team at FBI Headquarters, took any action on the Weiner laptop issue until the week of October 24, and then did so only after the Weiner case agent expressed concerns to [Southern District of New York], prompting SDNY to contact the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) on October 21 to raise concerns about the lack of action.”

    The report said instead of following up on the emails, Strzok decided to prioritize the Russia investigation into the Trump campaign.

    “[We] did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the [Clinton investigation]-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias,” it said.

    Furthermore, the inspector general report makes it clear that it does not weigh in on any judgment the DOJ or FBI made on the Clinton email case, and only investigated whether there was some legal justification behind those decisions, versus evidence of political bias.

    The inspector general found that there were legal justifications behind those decisions — written either at the time or explained to investigators afterwards, but refrained from making a judgment on the decisions themselves.

    Thus, the IG did not weigh on whether former FBI Director James Comey’s judgment that Clinton did not act with “gross negligence” was correct or not — just whether there was actual evidence of political bias behind it.

    The report said Comey’s interpretation of “gross negligence” was based on “core prosecutorial discretion that were for the Department to make.”

    Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement that U.S. Attorney John Huber would continue to review decisions made by the DOJ and FBI, and would provide recommendations on whether further investigation is necessary or merit a special counsel.

    “This is not the end of the process. United States Attorney John Huber continues his work in cooperation with the Inspector General to review certain prosecutorial and investigative determinations made by the Department in 2016 and 2017,” Sessions said.

    View the original article: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/breitbart/~3/NKYLk4LGO34/

    He has reviewed this report and, based on its findings and his own investigation, will provide recommendations as to whether any matter not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of Special Counsel,” he said.

    In the same category are

    Small Business Optimism Unexpectedly Rises, Hitting Second Highest Level Ever American small business owners are overwhelmingly optimistic. The Small Business Optimism Index marked its second highest level in the survey’s 45-yea...
    Donald Trump: Omarosa a ‘Dog’ and a ‘Crazed, Crying Lowlife’ President Donald Trump continued to criticize his former White House aide, Omarosa Manigault-Newman, on Tuesday, calling her a “dog.” “When you give a...
    Late-Night Hosts Mock ‘Con-Artist’ Omarosa: ‘Liar and Backstabber with No Credibility’ Late-night comedians mercilessly mocked former White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman as she seeks to promote her unflattering new book about life ...
    CBS News Suggests ‘N-Word’ Tape Exists, Omits Aide’s Suggestion that It Does Not CBS News reported Tuesday morning that a 2016 recording of Donald Trump’s campaign staff released by Omarosa Manigault-Newman “appears to confirm” her...
    Trump Campaign Files Arbitration Against Omarosa for Breaking NDA President Donald Trump’s campaign filed arbitration against Omarosa Manigault-Newman in a New York City court on Tuesday, accusing the former White Ho...
    Bokhari: Why Tech Giants Aren’t the Same as Christian Bakeries In the intense debate that followed the rapid-fire censorship of Alex Jones and Infowars across virtually every major digital distribution platform la...

    Leave a comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.