Paedophile awarded compensation by Human Rights Commission

Latest news

    This is a shocker. And I’ve put this in general conspiracies because to me this is highly conspiratorial to say the least.

    The actual headline & linkification;

    Human rights commission orders Suncorp to compensate paedophile after it refused to hire him because of his criminal record – but the bank refuses to pay

    So, to summarize;

    Paedophile “A” applies online for a job with a bank.

    Bank offers Paedophile “A” conditional employment.

    Bank subsequently discovers that Paedophile “A” is in-fact a paedophile with a criminal record and rescinds the offer.

    Presumably Paedophile “A” complains about discrimination, and here we are.

    Now, what’s is really important here is that he lied on the application form, yep, a big fat lie. He answered NO to the following question;

    Have you been convicted of an offence.

    If no was true then that would be ok, however;

    Paedophile “A” has a criminal record that dates back to 2008, which included convictions of ‘use of a carriage service to access child pornography material’ and ‘possession of child pornography’. Paedophile “A” was sentenced to a year in jail and was suspended for two years.

    At this point I suspect most people would say, fair enough, the bank is perfectly right to conduct itself in the way it did.

    Unfortunately the president of the AHRC didn’t see it that way;

    Prof Croucher said in a statement, ‘Notwithstanding the very serious nature of Mr BE’s convictions, I find that Suncorp’s decision to deny Mr BE the opportunity to access employment with Suncorp constituted an exclusion which impaired Mr BE’s equality of opportunity.

    To me that’s a bit like committing murder, standing trial for murder and having the whole lot thrown out because the actual act of murdering was completely inconsequential.

    It goes on;

    ‘I accept that having a conditional offer of employment ­extended to him, and then ­rescinded on the basis of a criminal record that does not adequately relate to the ­inherent requirements of the role has caused … distress’.

    At this point it’s pretty hard to fathom the decision.

    So far the bank has and is refusing to pay any compensation, and I sincerely hope it remains that way.

    View the original article:

    It’s a pretty disgusting matter really and to me seems like an extraordinary attempt to humanise paedophiles.

    In the same category are

    Anyone else thinking what Im thinking ? originally posted by: Kapustaa reply to: carewemust1 I've been on ATS since 2008 ,let the mods move it if they see fit2 I don't care and I'm not sur...
    Apollo 15 Astronaut Says Humans Are Descendants Of Ancient Aliens If I had to lay down money in Vegas on how the human race was started, I’m probably laying it on the Ancient Alien hypothesis.In order of what I feel ...
    $500 million lottery ticket claimed anonymously – how is this possible? So we had one of the largest powerball drawings this year and was just under $500 million. The prize went about a month before "being claimed" and it ...
    The ADAM Research Projects Latest Video With DeLonge And Elizondo 08/14/2018 a reply to: shawmanfromnyWake up and smell the deception, the money shuffling and the CIA I say. Puthoff? What has he ever done except produce paperwo...
    350 Times the Pay for only 50% More Work a reply to: CB328So if it's so horrible, why not start a company and make the big bucks?Instead of, you know, just whining about it.Because despite pe...
    1918 Spanish Newspaper UFO Story I found this little jewel, I just love old school UFO stories. As usual, very difficult to corroborate but delightful for sure. El Conquistador was a ...

    Leave a comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.